I came across a very amusing story today. As a few of you (I wish it was all of you), may know, the Wimbledon tennis tournament is currently going on over in England. As there are 128 men and 128 women who enter the singles events, let alone the men and women's doubles and the junior events, a LOT of courts are needed to accommodate all that matches that are being played. But there is one court that all players aspire to play at - Centre Court, the Court where the finals are played, the court that obviously has the most seat, the court which signifies that you have made it to the big time. Well, that is if you are male. As expected, the best male players almost always get to play on this court. Roger Federer, the #1 player in the world; he gets to play his matches there. But notice I said male players. What about the females? If the top seeded male got to play on Centre Court, surely, Dinara Safina, the top seeded female would play there too, right?
Well, if that were the case, we wouldn't have a story, would we? As it turns out, which females get to play on Centre Court in the earlier rounds is partially decided on the beauty factor. Yes, if you are pretty, you have a better chance to play on Center Court than if you are considered less that stellar on the attractiveness scale. I am not making this up. Jonny Perkins, who works for the All England Club (the organization that runs the tournament) came out and said that "good looks are a factor" in deciding who gets to play on Centre Court and that "It's not a coincidence that those (on Centre Court) are attractive." So, the other day when #1 seed Dinara Safina (Pic 1 below) and #2 seed Serena Williams were playing on outer, smaller courts, Centre Court saw a matchup of the 8th seed, Victoria Azarenka (pic 2 below) against 28th seed Sorana Cirstea (pic 3 below).
I like hot women as much as the next guy, but this isn't a beauty contest. The best ATHLETES should get the best treatment in an athletic event. Pretty sad....
10 comments:
That's pathetic. I may have just lost a little respect for Wimbledon...
Wow. What is nearly almost as shocking as the fact that they do this, is the fact that they admit that they do this. What an insult to all athletes, really.
I saw this story today, and later I honestly thought I dreamt it - surely it was too ridiculous to be real! That's a very sad commentary on the tournament, and an awful reminder of the double standards that exist in sports (and elsewhere, of course). What a shame.
I guess in the end it's still a business and air time and advertising play a huge role that could be as big as the athletes themselves. After all without them they would not get the big money.
That sucks. Who says sexism isn't alive and kicking?
This is ridiculous but I guess Jose is right. It is a business and beauty pays. I'm appalled but not at all surprised. Look at the fuss that was made about Susan Boyle and how she looks. That beautiful voice and yet all they talked about was her appearance. Sad.
That is pretty sad.. But I have yet to see an unnattractive athelete..It ought to be based on the best and not the prettiest.. Most
sports are like that I think..
Sounds like something they would do in WWE, not a legitimate competitive sport.
I just realized I forget to comment on this story yesterday. Hilarious story - something I never knew. Something I'm not surprised to read, however.
It is disgraceful. They don't do the same thing on the men's side. Hoping Roger pulls off his 15th slam, but I would be pulling for Nadal if he were playing. Nadal is out and out my favorite.
Post a Comment